SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1176

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
A. K. Yog, J.
R.P.PANDEY - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition 27277 Of 2000
Decided On : 09/07/2000

Advocates Appeared:
MUNNA PANDEY

The main legal point established in the judgment is that an Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) is entitled to a special compensatory allowance equivalent to 30% of the basic pay as per the Government Order dated 6th March, 1991, irrespective of residence or house rent allowance.

Headnote:

Special Allowance - Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) - Government Order dated 6th March, 1991 - The judgment discussed the provisions of the Government Order dated 6th March, 1991, which entitled an Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) to a special compensatory allowance equivalent to 30% of the basic pay. The court emphasized that the allowance was not dependent on the officer's residence or the payment of house rent allowance, and held that the petitioner was unjustly denied the allowance.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a member of Higher Judicial Service in the State of Uttar Pradesh, was denied the special compensatory allowance entitled to an Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) under the Government Order dated 6th March, 1991.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner fulfilled the conditions for the special compensatory allowance and was unjustly denied the allowance. It held that the petitioner was entitled to the allowance along with arrears and interest, and ordered the respondents to comply with the Government Order.

Issues: The main issue was the denial of the special compensatory allowance to the petitioner, despite fulfilling the conditions specified in the Government Order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the special compensatory allowance was not dependent on the officer's residence or the payment of house rent allowance, and held that the petitioner was entitled to the allowance as per the Government Order.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the compensatory special allowance to the petitioner, and ordered the payment of arrears with interest. The petitioner was also entitled to receive the allowance month by month as long as he held the post of Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid), Sonbhadra under the Government Order dated 6th March, 1991.

A. K. YOG, J.


( 1 ) PETITIONER is a member of Higher Judicial Service in State of Uttar Pradesh. He was transferred and appointed as Officer on Special Duty, (for short OSD) Legal Aid and Advice Board, sonebhadra under order dated 11th October, 1999 (Arnnexure-1 to the Writ Petition ). He got him relieved from Lucknow and submitted joining report at Allahabad on 12th October, 1999. He took over as Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) under High Court order whereby his office head Quarter to be at Allahabad. In para 5 of the petition it is stated that the petitioner is continuously performing his duties as OSD (Legal Aid) both at his Head Quarter at Allahabad and at Sonbhadra vide Government Order dated March 6, 1991 (Annexure-1 to the Writ petition ). Post of Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid), is created for due discharge of functions of legal Aid and Advisory Board at Sonebhadra for welfare of tribals. It is to be filled by a member of Higher Judicial Services, State of Uttar Pradesh and such an appointment has to be on deputation. This scheme is floated in pursuance to the directions given by Supreme Court in the case of Banwasi Seva Ashram v. State of Uttar Pradesh, vide judgment dated 15th February, 1991. Para 2 of the said Government Order dated March 6, 1991 provides that Officer on Special duty (Legal Aid) will be entitled to a special allowance equivalent to 30% of basic pay (Rs. 4,500-5,700/-at that time ).

( 2 ) THIS order also categorically mentions that this special allowance is a compensatory allowance and it will not be taken into account for any other purposes. Aforesaid order proclaims to have been concurrence of the Finance Department dated March 6, 1991 as well as with Governors sanction. The said order do not make it necessary for Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) to reside at Sonebhadra nor it is a condition precedent for grant of special compensatory allowance of 30% of basic pay and the aforesaid Government Order also do not provide that Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) shall be deprived or forfeit any other allowance for which the Judicial Officer is otherwise entitled under relevant Rules/government Order.

( 3 ) IN paras 7, 8 and 9 of the Writ Petition, the petitioner contends that he prayed for payment of this special compensatory allowance admissible to an Officer on Special Duty (Legal Aid) under government Order dated 6th March, 1991 but he was not paid. He thereafter filed representation dated 30th October, 1999 (with the recommendation of Incharge Chairman, State Legal Aid tribunal (Mr. Justice Girdhar Malviya) to the Joint Director, Treasury, Annexure-6 to the Writ petition. The Joint Director (Treasury), Allahabad sent letter dated 18th November, 1999 addressed to the Secretary, U. P. Government sought Clarification (Annexure 7 to the Writ petition ). He referred to G. Original Suit. 12. 12. 1996. April 1, 1991 under which creation of presiding Officer of certain Courts (equivalent for Additional District Judges) shall be entitled to banwasi compensatory special allowance equivalent to 30% of basic pay. Under these orders five Courts of Additional District Judge are said to be created and in addition to them another one Court of Additional District Judge and for them District Judge/district Magistrate of sonebhadra (erstwhile Mirzapur) are said to be responsible to provide residences to such presiding Officer.

( 4 ) THE Joint Director (Treasury), Allahabad sought for clarification on two points. The first point of clarification is whether a Judicial Officer, who has been appointed on the post of officer on special Duty (Legal Aid) will be entitled to Special Allowance and also house allowance permissible for Allahabad (KAVAL Town ).

( 5 ) THE Joint Director (Treasury), Allahabad apparent lost sight of the fact that the Government order dated 6th March, 1991 is not dependent upon actual residence of the officer at sonebhadra. Grant of Special Compensatory allowance is not dependent upon any


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top