SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1276

SUDHIR NARAIN, O.BHATT
TEJENDRA KAUR – Appellant
Versus
JOGENDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, FAUJDAR RAI, PRAKASH KRISHNA, R.C.SRIVASTAVA

SUDHIR NARAIN, ONKARESHWAR BHATT, JJ.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of the Family Court, Moradabad, whereby the suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the plaintiff-respondent for divorce has been decreed.

( 2 ) THE allegation of the husband plaintiff was that he married the appellant on 8. 12. 1994. She lived with him for about two months, and thereafter she left the matrimonial house and went to live with her parents. He doubted that his wife had relationship with some other persons. She dtd not permit him to have the sexual relationship. She gave birth to a son in July, 1996, who was not bom out of their wedlock. The relations became strained but the relative of both the parties got compromise written on 2. 12. 1995 wherein it was agreed that the appellant will come and reside with him. The wife after the compromise came to reside with him but after some lime, she left and started living with her parents.

( 3 ) THE appellant contested the suit and she denied the allegations of desertion, adultery and cruelty. The family court found that the respondent failed to prove by cogent evidence that his wife had any unfair relationship with any othe


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top