SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1266

S.K.SEN, G.P.MATHUR
MUDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, U. P. , LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT KRISHNAN, B.D.Mandhyan, RAVI KANT CHADHA

G. P. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner contested election for the office of Pradhan of village Bhura, Tehsil Kairana, District Muzaffarnagar which was held on 23/06/2000. In the said election 4902 votes were cast out of which 308 votes were rejected as invalid. The petitioner secured 1597 votes while Rishipal, respondent No. (sic) secured 1752 votes and was accordingly declared to have been elected as pradhan. The present writ petition under Article of the Constitution has been filed praying for several reliefs including a writ of quo warranto asking respondent No. 4 to show his authority to hold the office of pradhan, a writ of mandamus for restraining respondent No. 4 from functioning as pradhan of the village, a writ of mandamus commanding State Election Commission and District Returning Officer to hold fresh election of the office of pradhan of village Bhura in accordance with the revised electoral rolls after deleting names of those who were wrongly included in the electoral roll of the gaon sabha. Further relief has been sought praying the writ of mandamus be issued commanding the State Election Commission and the District Returning Officer to delete the names of all those per



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top