SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1527

G.P.MATHUR, U.S.TRIPATHI
RAJEEV VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


( 1 ) A supplementary affidavit has been filed alongwith an application, wherein it is averred that at the instance of relatives of both the sides a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No. 4 and in the said settlement the petitioner No. 1 has paid Rs. 1,20,000/- to smt. Sharda Devi daughter of respondent No. 4. It is further averred that as a result of the compromise, the petition filed by Smt. Sharda Devi before the Judge, Family Court, Allahabad has been dismissed on 16. 10. 2000 and a compromise has also been entered into between the parties in divorce suit. Sri Anil Kumar Singh has made a statement that after filing of supplementary affidavit a decree for divorce has also been passed. The fact that the parties have entered into compromise has been admitted in para 7 of the counter affidavit filed by the complainant Kamla Prasad Seth respondent No. 4.

( 2 ) TAKING into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Investigating Officer of the case to conclude the investigation in Case Crime No. 12 of 2000, under Section 498-A, I. P. C. and Section 3/4, Dowry Prohibition a





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top