SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 67

M.L.SINGHAL
SHIV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ONKAR SINGH

M. L. SINGHAL, J.

( 1 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the accused-applicant and the learned A. G. A. for the State.

( 2 ) IT is alleged that on 31-5-1998 the accused- applicant, husband of the deceased, along with his father and mother, on account of dowry demand set fire to the deceased resulting in her death. Undisputedly, the marriage took place 4-5 years before. There are several allegations of demand of dowry. There is no evidence that soon before her death the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment by the applicant or his any relative in connection with the demand of dowry. The recitals in the First Information Report state that the applicant himself admitted the deceased in the hospital. The allegations in the FIR also show that the parents of the deceased were duly informed. The aforesaid acts of the accused are inconsistent with the guilt of the accused-applicant.

( 3 ) THE accused-applicant Shiv Kumar in Case Crime No. 95 of 1998 under Section 498-A/304-B, I. P. C. and 3/4, Dowry Prohibition Act, P. S. Bhopa, District Muzaffarnagar shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top