SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 261

G.P.MATHUR, J.C.MISHRA, K.D.SHAHI
GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D.Giri, Gopal Chaturvedi, P.N.MISHRA, U.N.Sharma

K. D. SHAHI, J.


( 1 ) THESE appeals were once heard by a Division Bench of this Court, consisting of Sri Girdhar Malviya, J. (since retired) and Sri B. K. Sharma, J. Both the Judges gave contradictory opinion. There was difference of opinion in their judgment. Shri Girdhar Malviya, J. upheld the conviction. Sri B. K. Sharma, J. after reading the judgment recorded by Sri Girdhar Malviya, J. was of the view that the appeals deserve to be allowed and all the appellants deserve acquittal.

( 2 ) THEN there was again difference of opinion between both the Judges on the question whether the appeals be laid before the 3rd Judge or be re-heard and decided by a Larger Bench. The matter was then referred to Honble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders. Honble the Chief Justice by constituting this Larger Bench directed that the appeals be laid before the bench of three Judges for re-hearing and disposal. This is how these appeals came up for hearing and were heard by this Larger Bench.

( 3 ) RAM Ajore PW-1 lodged an FIR on 20-10-1983 at 2 a. m. in respect of the murders of Vijai Kumar, Vinod Kumar, Rampati and Sheo Kumar and dangerous injuries to Rakesh Kumar in the night of 19/20-10-1983



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top