SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 190

SUDHIR NARAIN
LAXMAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BALLIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Mandhyan

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.


( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 22. 9. 1986 of the Judge small Causes Court decreeing the suit for recovery of arrears of rent, ejectment and damages against the petitioner and the order of the revisional court dated 12. 9. 1991 affirming the said judgment in revision.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 3 filed Suit No. 20 of 1984 against the petitioner for recovery of arrears of rent, ejectment and damages on the allegation that the shop in question was constructed in the year 1976 and, therefore, he was not entitled to the benefit of provisions of U. P. Urban buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act. 1972 (in short the Act ). The tenancy of the petitioner was terminated by notice dated 25. 10. 1984 and he having not vacated the shop in question, the suit was instituted.

( 3 ) THE petitioner contested the suit. It was denied that the shop in question was constructed in the year 1976. It was old building and only some repairs were made in the disputed shop. It was further alleged that he is one of the co-tenants and his father and brother are also tenants. The judge Small Causes Court held that the shop in question was c
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top