IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
BEFORE HONble M. KATJU, J. , HONble R. K. SINGH, J.
CHHIDDA KHAN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
CIVIL MISC WRIT PETITION 14168 Of 1999
Decided On : 04/06/1999
Loudspeakers - Religious Practices - The court issued a humble appeal to refrain from using loudspeakers for religious practices, emphasizing the fundamental right to practice religion freely while considering the inconvenience caused to others.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's case was covered by a previous Division Bench decision. The court issued a humble appeal to the public to refrain from using loudspeakers for religious practices due to the inconvenience caused to others.
Finding of the Court:
The court emphasized the fundamental right to practice religion freely but urged gentle persuasion and avoidance of coercion in religious matters. The court made it clear that the appeal was not a binding order and expressed confidence in the good sense of the people to voluntarily accept the suggestion.
Issues: Inconvenience caused by the use of loudspeakers for religious practices.
Ratio Decidendi: The fundamental right to practice religion freely should be exercised in a manner that does not cause harassment or inconvenience to others. Coercion in religious matters should be avoided, and gentle persuasion is encouraged.
Final Decision: The writ petition was finally disposed of with the issuance of a humble appeal to refrain from using loudspeakers for religious practices.
( 2 ) HOWEVER we wish to issue a humble appeal to the general public to refrain from utilizing loudspeakers, whether it is for akhand Ramayan, Azan, Kirtan, Quawwali or public programmes, functions, marriages, or for any such purposes because this is causing a great deal of inconvenience And harassment to the general public, particularly to persons who may be having heart problems and want to get sound rest, students who wish to study, and others who do not wish to be disturbed.
( 3 ) IN our opinion no doubt everyone has a fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution to practice his religion freely, but this right should not be exercised in a manner which causes harassment or inconvenience to others. Hence we are issuing this humble appeal to people of all religions. We make it clear that this is only a humble appeal and not a binding order on the petitioner or on anyone. In religious matters coercion should be avoided as that makes people bigoted or fanatic. Hence the method to be used is gentle persuasion, and not coercion. We are therefore only issuing a humble appeal not to use loudspeakers, and are not passing any order in this connection. We have confidence in the good sense of the people of this country that they will abide by reasonable and good suggestions of this court. We made it clear that since this is only an appeal the authorities will not seek to enforce it, and we are confident the people of all religions will voluntarily accept it if they find it fair and reasonable. With the aforesaid directions and suggestions the writ petition is finally disposed off.
.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.