SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 441

M.KATJU, R.K.SINGH
CHHIDDA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amar Nath Bhargava

( 1 ) THE case of the petitioner is covered by the Division Bench decision of this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 42403 of 1998 Mohd v Sharif Saifi Vs State of U. P. and others. We issue the same direction in this case also.

( 2 ) HOWEVER we wish to issue a humble appeal to the general public to refrain from utilizing loudspeakers, whether it is for akhand Ramayan, Azan, Kirtan, Quawwali or public programmes, functions, marriages, or for any such purposes because this is causing a great deal of inconvenience And harassment to the general public, particularly to persons who may be having heart problems and want to get sound rest, students who wish to study, and others who do not wish to be disturbed.

( 3 ) IN our opinion no doubt everyone has a fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution to practice his religion freely, but this right should not be exercised in a manner which causes harassment or inconvenience to others. Hence we are issuing this humble appeal to people of all religions. We make it clear that this is only a humble appeal and not a binding order on the petitioner or on anyone. In religious matters coercion should be avoided as that makes people big



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top