SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 438

B.K.SHARMA
PARSOON KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Mishra, RAKESH SRIVASTAVA

B. K. SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision against the order dated 16-7-1998 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh in complaint case No. 338 of 1998, Anjana Srivastava v. Prasoon Srivastava whereby he directed the summoning of the accused-revisionists for the offences under Sections 498-A/504, I. P. C.

( 2 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

( 3 ) THE facts leading to this revision are that Smt. Anjana Srivastava wife of Sri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava (opposite party No. 2) filed a criminal complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh on 3-6-1998 against the revisionists. Prasoon Kumar Srivastava, Revisionist No. 1, is the elder brother of the husband of the complainant opposite party No. 2; Smt. Neeta Srivastava, revisionist No. 2 is the mother-in-law of the complainant while Triloki Nath Srivastava, Revisionist No. 3, is the father-in-law of the complainant. The allegations made in the complaint were that the complainant Smt. Anjana Srivastava was married to Pradeep Srivastava on 1-12-1995 according to Hindu Customs and went in Biato the house of the accused-revisionists that in the marriage her father had spent money beyond his means and even given Rs. 2,50,000. 00














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top