SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 529

A.K.YOG
RANBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.S.SINGH, Shailendra

A. K. YOG, J.


( 1 ) IT is a petition by 20 persons, who claim to have been working as Head Constables in various police stations in different Districts of the State of Uttar Pradesh.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS claim that they were working on the date of filing of petition in the pay scale of Rs. 1,640-2. 900 having their designation as Head Constables. According to the petitioners, this promotional pay scale in the cadre of Head Constable is the minimum in the pay scale provided for a cadre of Sub-Inspector. Relevant details have been given in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the writ petition as well as chart filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Petitioners claim that respective duties assigned to different cadres and officers have been provided in the Police Regulations. Regulations 55 to 57 provide for duties of Head Constable.

( 3 ) REGULATION 51 of the U. P. Police Regulations lays down duties assigned to a person working on the post of Sub-Inspector. It is contended that the duties as contemplated under relevant paragraphs of the Police Regulation provide for duties of the Head Constable, which do not include investigation of cases. The petitioners further contended that the appointment on




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top