R.D.SHUKLA, R.H.ZAIDI
MAHENDRA PAL – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR, HARDOI – Respondent
( 1 ) BY means of this petition under Article 326 of the Constitution of India, petitioner nitially prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certtorari quashing the notices dated 1. 7. 1997 and 14. 7. 1997 issued to convene the meeting of Kshetriya Samiti, Tandiyana, Tehsil and district Hardoi for consideration of no-confidence motion against the jetitioner. Prayers for issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to hold meeting on 3. 8. 1997 and to allow the petitioner to work as Block Pramukh, were also made. Subsequently, by means of amendment allowed on 16. 10. 1997. prayer for quashing the proceedings of the meeting and motion of no confidence passed on 3. 8. 1997 was also added.
( 2 ) IT appears that against the petitioner who happened to be Block Pramukh of Kshetriya Samiti, tandiyana Block, district Hardor as many as 35 members out of 63 gave a notice to the collector, to convene meeting for consideration of no-confidence motion against him, along with the copy of no-confidence motion on 4. 7. 1997. on the basis of which the Collector issued notices for holding meeting on 3. 8. 1997. On receipt of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.