SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 679

R.D.SHUKLA, R.H.ZAIDI
MAHENDRA PAL – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR, HARDOI – Respondent


R. H. ZAIDI, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this petition under Article 326 of the Constitution of India, petitioner nitially prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certtorari quashing the notices dated 1. 7. 1997 and 14. 7. 1997 issued to convene the meeting of Kshetriya Samiti, Tandiyana, Tehsil and district Hardoi for consideration of no-confidence motion against the jetitioner. Prayers for issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to hold meeting on 3. 8. 1997 and to allow the petitioner to work as Block Pramukh, were also made. Subsequently, by means of amendment allowed on 16. 10. 1997. prayer for quashing the proceedings of the meeting and motion of no confidence passed on 3. 8. 1997 was also added.

( 2 ) IT appears that against the petitioner who happened to be Block Pramukh of Kshetriya Samiti, tandiyana Block, district Hardor as many as 35 members out of 63 gave a notice to the collector, to convene meeting for consideration of no-confidence motion against him, along with the copy of no-confidence motion on 4. 7. 1997. on the basis of which the Collector issued notices for holding meeting on 3. 8. 1997. On receipt of th















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top