SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 882

O.P.GARG
INDIA SURGICAL WORKS, GHAZIABAD – Appellant
Versus
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Mandhyan, VINOD SINHA

O. P. GARG, J.


( 1 ) THE core question involved for consideration on and determination in the present writ petition is whether the absorbent cotton, popularly known as surgical cotton comes within the orbit of the expression agricultural produce as defined in Section 2 (a) of the U. P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi adhinlyam, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and market fee is leviable thereon under section 17 (iii) (b) of the Act treating it to be cotton (ginned and unginned) as mentioned at SI. No. 3 of item (iv) Fibres. Detailed in the Schedule appended to the Act.

( 2 ) THE above controversy has come up before this Court in the backdrop of the following facts : the petitioner No. 1-M/s. Indian Surgical Works. Garh Road, Tilakwa. district Ghaziabad, through its partner-petitioner No. 2. is engaged in the wholesale and retail sale of absorbent cotton wool (I. P.) (for short absorbent cotton ). The respondent Nos, 2 and 3 (compendiously referred to as mandi Samiti) required the petitioners to obtain a licence so that Mandi Samiti of the area may regulate the sale and purchase of the absorbent cotton. It also served a notice dated 31. 8. 1998 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) on the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top