SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1083

V.M.SAHAI
PALAK DHARI YADAV – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL INSPECTRESS OF SCHOOLS, GORAKHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DHANAJAY PRASAD, G.N.Verma, PRAKASH PADIYA, R.G.PADIA

V. M. SAHAI, J.

( 1 ) THE short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether in an institution where there is only one post can it be filled by direct recruitment or by promotion under regulation 2 (2) of Chapter III of the regulations framed under the U. P. Intermediate Education act, 1921.

( 2 ) THE contextual facts in Writ Petition No. 6681 of 1990 depicts that the petitioner Palak Dhari yadav a Class IV employee working since 1980 in D. A. V. Girls Higher Secondary School, Mau nath Bhanjan, Mau (in brief institution) was eligible and qualified to be promoted as clerk. There were three other class IV employees who were senior to him but were not eligible and qualified for promotion. There was only one post of clerk in the institution, which was vacant. The management filled the post by direct recruitment and appointed respondent No. 4 Sanjay kumar Upadhyay on 18. 8. 1989. The petitioner on 2. 9. 1989 made representation before respondent No. 1 that he may be promoted to the post of clerk as he is eligible for the same. The respondent No. 1 on 16. 9. 1989 wrote to the management for consideration of his claim. Since nothing was done by the management th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top