YATINDRA SINGH
MUNICIPAL BOARD, CHUNAR – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL S. D. O. , SADAR, MIRZAPUR – Respondent
( 1 ) IS the U. P. Tenancy Act. 1939 (the Tenancy Act for short), a law relating to land tenure within the meaning of the U. P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972 [the Act for short)? Is land held by a tenure holder under the Tenancy Act. premises within the meaning of the Act? These questions arise for determination in these four writ petitions. This is how they arise. FACTS
( 2 ) THE property in dispute is Nazul property. The concerned District Magistrate had leased it out in favour of the predecessor-in -interest of the contesting respondents. The notified area committee had renewed it for a term. Subsequently, the lessees transferred the property in favour of the contesting respondents. After expiry of the period of the leases, a notice was issued to the contesting respondents under the Act for their eviction in proceedings initiated by the Municipal board, Chunar. Mirzapur (The Board for short ). It is not disputed that now the Board manages the property. The Courts below have dismissed the proceedings on the ground that property in dispute is not premises under the Act. Hence these writ petitions. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION
( 3 ) I h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.