( 1 ) THE petitioner after his retirement had been paid the amount of his provident fund due to him. But the Gratuity and other terminal benefits were not paid to him on the ground as disclosed in the counter Affidavit that there was an audit objection in respect of certain accounts when the petitioner was posted in Hewett Road branch. Such statements were made in paragraph 2 of the Counter affidavit In Rejoinder Affidavit, the petitioner has clarified that he was posted in Hewett Road Branch sometimes in between 1980 and 1984. The audit objection was in respect of the provident fund amount of Nagar Mahapalik, Allahabad in respect of their employees that were transferred to the sundry Creditors account in the Bank nagar Mahapalika was asked to furnish the details of the individual account number of the employees so that the provident fund amount received by the bank could be credited in the respective individual account of the employees. The Nagar Mahapalika had furnished the details some of its employees without furnishing the details of the others. Therefore, part of the amount was transferred to the individual accounts. After such transfer, a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- still remained

Click Here to Read the rest of this document