S.H.A.RAZA, NASEEMUDDIN
BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH BAR COUNCIL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE main thrust of the petitioner Bar Association in this writ petition is that fake Bar associations have spread their wings in every district, as a result of which the work of the Courts is disrupted. If a particular Bar Association passes a resolution to abstain from the judicial work the another Bar Association passes a resolution to abstain from the judicial work the another Bar association goes against it and the same has created a difficulty not only to the judicial officers but it also creates a lot of difficulty and hardship to the sincere and dedicated lawyers engaged in the process of dispensation of justice. Do to stopage of work in the Court the litigants arc the worst sufferers. Although this writ petition was filed by one Bar Association of an Outlying court of a particular district but it is necessary that the U. P. Bar Council should devise a policy and issue guidelines which should be observed by each and even Bar Association regarding the fake Bar Associations as well and in what circumstances the Court should not be allowed to function.
( 2 ) OUR attention has been drawn towards a circular of the U. P. Bar Council. We are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.