SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1139

S.H.A.RAZA, NASEEMUDDIN
BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH BAR COUNCIL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.Arora, Y.S.LOHIT

S. H. A. RAZA AND NASEEMUDDIN, JJ.

( 1 ) THE main thrust of the petitioner Bar Association in this writ petition is that fake Bar associations have spread their wings in every district, as a result of which the work of the Courts is disrupted. If a particular Bar Association passes a resolution to abstain from the judicial work the another Bar Association passes a resolution to abstain from the judicial work the another Bar association goes against it and the same has created a difficulty not only to the judicial officers but it also creates a lot of difficulty and hardship to the sincere and dedicated lawyers engaged in the process of dispensation of justice. Do to stopage of work in the Court the litigants arc the worst sufferers. Although this writ petition was filed by one Bar Association of an Outlying court of a particular district but it is necessary that the U. P. Bar Council should devise a policy and issue guidelines which should be observed by each and even Bar Association regarding the fake Bar Associations as well and in what circumstances the Court should not be allowed to function.

( 2 ) OUR attention has been drawn towards a circular of the U. P. Bar Council. We are





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top