SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1112

NASEEMUDDIN, VIRENDRA SARAN
KM. POONAM AWASTHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


VIRENDRA SARAN AND NASEEMUDDIN, JJ.

( 1 ) KUMARI Poonam Awasthi has filed this writ petition for quashing the first information report dated 8. 5. 1998 in Case Crime No. 174 of 1998 Police Station Kotwali Gola, district Khert.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner and learned Government advocate were heard.

( 3 ) IT appears that opposite party No. 3 Dr. O. P. Mlshra (Senior Superintendent) Principal, c. G. N. (P. G.) College, Gokaran Nath, district Kheri lodged an F. I. R. with the allegation that on 8. 5. 1998 at about 7. 10 a. m. the petitioner, who was appearing in the examination of B. A. II year, handed over some unauthorised material to the invigilator in the examination room after the distribution of the question papers at 7. 10 a. m. She was appearing on that day in 1998 Studies hindi Literature II paper. That the petitioner did not make use of the material. That even then in order to save the infectious effect of keeping the unauthorised material, action was taken against her and second copy was given to her for examination. The F. I. R. was lodged under Section 3/9 of the U. P. Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act. 1998 (hereinafter as the act ). A case







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top