D.K.SETH
MRS. BHARTI KRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
VICE-CHANCELLOR, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY – Respondent
( 1 ) AN advertisement was issued on 13th October, 1995 by Banaras Hindu University for filling up of vacancies in different Posts in the Central Hindu Girls School including the post of assistant Lecturer in English. Many others as well as the petitioner and respondent No. 5 had applied for the post pursuant to the said advertisement. At the material point of time, in the absence of the principal, the respondent No. 4 was acting as principal of the Central Hindu Girls school as officiating principal. She was inducted in the Selection committee as one of the members in place of the principal. The selection committee had recommended the name of the respondent No. 5 for appointment in the post for which the petitioner had contested. By a resolution dated 20/21st July 1996, the Executive council had appointed the respondent No. 5 in the said post. This appointment has since been challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition.
( 2 ) MR. K. M. L. Hajela, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the constitution of the selection Committee was invalid in view of Ordinance 5 Clause- (VI) (C) Chapter-VI of the banaras Hindu University Calendar providing for the Or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.