SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1257

V.M.SAHAI
HIYAT KHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DINESH KAKKAR, Hiyat Khan

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Hiyat Khan, the petitioner in person and Sri Dinesh kakkar learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2. the Petitioner sates that he does not press his claim against respondents 3 and 4 and respondent no. 1 is a formal party. In view of this statement this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

( 2 ) THE Petitioner was a trained Machinist and he joined two years training with respondent no. 2. He completed one years training and thereafter his training was terminated by the respondents. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 39148 of 1987 wherein this court set aside the termination order dated 19. 9. 1997 and permitted the respondents to pass a fresh order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner has completed one years training and if he is permitted by respondents then he shall undergo one years further training excluding the period from 19. 5. 1997 till the date of passing of fresh order. The judgement of this court dated 21. 5. 1998 is quoted below ;

"the petitioner seeks writ of writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 19th September, 1997 whereby the director of indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, respondent no.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top