SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1447

A.K.YOG
VIRENDRA PAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GHAZIABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.DIWAN, K.M.Garg, Ravi Aggrawal

A. K. YOG, J.


( 1 ) VIRENDRA Pal Gupta, is the tenant of a shop situate in Upper Bazar, Opposite Raj Talkies, modinagar, Tehsll and District Ghazlabad. Sri Mahavir Prasad and his wife Smt. Srimatl Devi (respondent Nos. 3 and 4) are the landlord. Release application was filed under Section 21 (1) (a)of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 Act No. XIII of 1972) (for short called the Act) on the ground that landlord required bona fide said shop for settling his son. Parties led evidence and after hearing them, Prescribed Authority came to the conclusion that need of the landlord was bona fide. But rejected the release application on the ground that tenant shall suffer more hardship as compared to the landlord, in case release application was allowed.

( 2 ) LANDLORD filed Rent Control Appeal No. 87 of 1988 under Section 22 of the Act. Appellate authority (III Additional District Judge, Ghazlabad/respondent No. 1) after perusing relevant evidence and material on record as well as hearing the parties came to the conclusion that landlord wanted the shop in question for establishing his son who was unemployed. Learned appellate Authority also obser

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top