SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1739

S.K.PHAUJDAR
SWADESHI COTTON MILLS – Appellant
Versus
ASST LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahima Maurya, V.B.SINGH

S. K. PHAUJDAR, J.

( 1 ) ALL the aforesaid matters were heard together as a common point of law stood involved in all these cases. The present order, accordingly, would cover all the aforesaid petitions.

( 2 ) THE petitioners run an industry as a unit of National Textile Corporation (in short, the ntc) at Naini, Allahabad. It is the case of the petitioner that the NTC is an undertaking of the government of India under the provisions of the Industrial Development Regulation Act and the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986. The unit became sick and had submitted a reference under Section 15 (1) of the Sick industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (in short, the SICA 1985), before the board for the Industrial and Financial re-structuring (in short, the BIFR ). It was the further case of the petitioners that the reference was registered by BIFR by its order dated June 8, 1993 and the petitioner company had been declared sick under Section 3 (1) (o) of the sica, 1985. It was urged on behalf of the petitioners that being declared a sick unit, no recovery proceedings were to be initiated against the petitioner mill under Section 22




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top