SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1802

M.KATJU, D.R.CHAUDHARY
KALU RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.N.Tripathi

M. KATJU AND D. R. CHAUDHARY, JJ.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is challenging the impugned termination order dated 7. 4. 99 (Annexure-12 to the writ petition ). The petitioner was appointed in the year 1963 as Junior Engineer in Minor irrigation Department. Uttar Pradesh Government. At the time of termination of service, he was working as Executive Engineer. Thus, the petitioner has put in about 36 years service. Now the impugned termination order dated 7. 4. 99 has been passed in which it has been stated that the petitioner did not possess a Diploma from a recognised institution and hence his initial appointment in the year 1963 was Illegal. The Diploma, which the petitioner has is from Asia engineering Institute, New Delhi and it is alleged that this body is not recognised by the Central or State Government.

( 3 ) IN our opinion, it is not open to the respondents to suddenly wake up after a gap of 35 years and declare that the petitioners certificate which he obtained before entering service in the year 1963 was not a recognised certificate, and hence the petitioners initial appointment in the year 1963 is inval





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top