SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1848

M.KATJU, D.R.CHAUDHARY
RAJESH MOHAN SUKHLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Mathur, P.K.Misra, S.K.DWIVEDI

M. KATJU AND D. R. CHAUDHARY, JJ.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri K. B. Mathur for the petitioner and Sri S. K. Dwivedi for the respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are youth coordinators and their prayer is to grant equal pay and allowances and other benefits which are being given to other youth coordinators on the basis of the principle of equal pay for equal work. It may be mentioned that Nehru Yuva Kendra originally was controlled by the Ministry of Human Resources Development, Department of Youth Affairs and sport of the Central Government. The petitioners appointments were made in the said Scheme. The grievance of the petitioners is that they are not paid the same salaries, allowances and other benefits as are being given to the coordinators appointed by the Central Government whereas they are discharging the same functions. This fact has not been denied in the counter-affidavit, rather it has been admitted in para 21 of the counter-affidavit. The only difference in the two categories is in the mode of recruitment, in our opinion this cannot make any difference in respect of their salaries and allowances since both the categories do the same work and functions.

( 3 ) THE petitioners have





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top