B.K.RATHI
SWARAN MUNJAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C. have been filed to quash the proceedings of complaint case Nos. 947 of 1998, 543 of 1998, 542 of 1998 and 946 of 1998, all pending in the Court of C. J. M. , Agra under Section 138 of N. I. Act filed against the petitioners by respondent No. 2. All the complaints have been filed with similar allegations and these petitions involve the common questions for decision and therefore, are being disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) I have heard Sri V. K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners in all the four cases and Sri K. K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. The complaint under Section 138, N. I. Act have been filed by the respondent No. 2 against the petitioners with the usual allegations that the cheque issued by the petitioners were dishonoured and the amount of the cheque has not been paid in spite of the service of notice within fifteen days of the date of dishonour. That, therefore, the petitioners have committed an offence punishable under Section 138, N. I. Act.
( 3 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that criminality has been attached by Section 138, N. I. Act t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.