SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 49

N.L.GANGULY
U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GOPAL NARAIN, RANJEET SAXENA, Shyam Narayan

N. L. GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the award of the Labour Court. Gorakhpur dated October 5. 1993 in Adjudication Case No. 124 of 1988. Annexure 9 to the Writ petition. At the initial stage when the petition was filed the standing counsel had accepted notice for respondent No. 1 and Sri Shyam Narain had accepted notice for respondent No. 3. Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit have been exchanged between the parlies. The Writ petition is being decided finally at the admission stage with the consent of the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner. U. P. State Electricity Board, filed this Writ petition with the allegations that the respondent No. 3 was appointed on the post of Beldar on April 16, 1974 by the Board at gorakhpur. There is no post of condencer attendant at Gorakhpur nor he was ever appointed as condencer attendant. The respondent No. 3 raised an industrial dispute under Section 4-A of the u. P. Industrial Disputes Act. A reference was made by the state for adjudication to the Labour court, Gorakhpur as under: 1. Whether the employers are liable to make respondent Sri Chandra Shekhar Tewari permanent on the post of condenser attendant if so, from w









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top