SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 34

S.C.MOHAPATRA, V.P.GOEL
UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANS. CORPN. – Appellant
Versus
TARA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.SHARMA, S.N.AGARWAL

S. C. MOHAPATRA, V. P. GOEL, JJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the owner under Section 110-D of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

( 2 ) ON 22. 9. 1986 deceased was travelling in a bus belonging to the appellant. On the way the bus hit a cart carrying long poles. One of the poles pierced into the bus and caused injuries to the deceased to which he succumbed. On this account attributing negligence in driving of the bus, widow of the deceased and his major sons have filed an application claiming compensation of rs. 4,00,0007 -.

( 3 ) OWNER contested the application where it asserted that there was no negligence in driving of the bus and accordingly, it would not be liable to pay compensation.

( 4 ) THE Tribunal on consideration of materials on the record held that driver of the bus was negligent in driving which resulted in the accident causing fatal injury to the deceased. It held that deceased was having a monthly income of Rs. 2,000/- at the time of his death and from out of it spending Rs. 500/- for himself, he was contributing the balance to the family. Tribunal determined just compensation of Rs. 2,62,000/- on the finding that the major sons are not entitled to any compensation. Excessive







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top