SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 195

D.S.SINHA
SATYENDRA PRASAD JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Janardan Sahai

D. S. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Janardan Sahai, learned counsel for the applicants.

( 2 ) THE order dated 29/08/1988, passed by the V Addl. Civil Judge, Meerut in Original Suit No. 453 of 1987 between Satyendra Prasad Jain and others and State of U. P. and others, rejecting the report of the Amin is under challenge in the instant revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, hereinafter called the Code.

( 3 ) SECOND proviso to Section 115 of the Code, is amended by the State of Uttar Pradesh, forbids the revisional court from varying or reversing any order including an order deciding an issue made in the course of a suit or other proceeding, except where the order, if so varied or reversed, would finally dispose of the suit or other proceedings; or the order, if allowed to stand, would occasion a failure of justice or cause irreparable injury to the party against whom it is made. Learned counsel for the applicants has failed to demonstrate existence of any of the aforesaid two conditions envisaged in the second proviso to Section 115 of the Code.

( 4 ) THE Court, therefore, declines to interfere with the impugned order.

( 5 ) IN the result, the revision fails and



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top