SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 310

R.A.SHARMA, M.C.AGARWAL
MAZHAR ALI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FATEHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJIV CHADDA

R. A. SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) ON 23-2-1995 the petitioners passenger bus was seized by Station House Officer, police station Kotwali, Fatehpur. The petitioner thereafter moved an application for release of his vehicle before the Regional Transport Officer, Allahabad. This application has been rejected on 28-2-1995 on the ground that as the vehicle has been seized by the police Official, he has no power under sub-section (2) of Section 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to release the vehiclepetitioner also moved an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate for release of vehicle but his prayer has also been rejected by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 28-2-1995 on the ground that he has no power under sub-section (2) of Section 207 of the Act to pass any order of release. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.

( 3 ) UNDER sub-section (1) of Section 207 any police officer or other person authorised in this behalf may seize and detain the vehicle if he has reason to believe that the vehicle is being used in contravention of the provi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top