SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 340

K.L.SHARMA
S. SUBRAMANIUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.Verma, Sharad Malviya, VIRENDRA SINGH

K. L. SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under S. 482, Cr. P. C. for quashing the summoning order as well as the criminal proceeding in complaint case No. 3435 of 1993 under Ss. 447, 120b, I. P. C. between Ajay Kumar Varma v. Subramaniam and others pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasia, Deoria.

( 2 ) I have heard Sri S. N. Varma, Senior Advocate and the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 as well as learned A. G. A. and perused the material brought on record.

( 3 ) SINCE counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties, the following admitted facts emerged from the pleadings :the opposite party No. 2 is the owner and landlord of the building situate on plot Nos. 2214/2 and 2215 of village Kasiya, Tappa Nanpur, Pargana Sidhua Jobna, Tehsil Padrauna, district Deoria. He let out the aforesaid premises for opening the branch of Central Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as bank) at Kasia in the district Deoria. The applicant No. 1 is the Chairman and the Managing Director of the Bank posted at its head quarter in Chandramukhi, Nariman Point, Bombay. Applicant No. 2 i





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top