SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 622

R.A.SHARMA, D.K.SETH
OM PRAKASH TEWARI – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BALLIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C.Pathak, M.P.SINHA, S.P.PANDEY

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners case, in short, in the present Writ Application, is that the petitioner was granted a contract for the period 1-4-1994 to 31-3-1995 for the realisation of Tahbazari over Bus-Taxi Stand on Ballia Sikandarpur Road for Rs. 20,500. 00 on the basis of his participation in the auction held on 24th Feb. 1994 pursuant to advertisement published in the Newspaper. The petitioner had made an application to the District Magistrate/ Officer Incharge, Nagarpalika Parishad, District Ballia, for granting him contract for the period 1995-96 at an enhanced rate of 20% than the earlier year. Ignoring the said application, the District Magistrate granted a contract to one Rameswar Singh Yadav for the period 1995-96 at an enhanced rate of 20% from the earlier year, namely, for Rs. 24,600. 00. The petitioner is also ready and agreed to tender the said amount. He has also contended that the contract ought to have been awarded through auction or by inviting tender and not otherwise. Therefore, he prays for setting aside the grant of contract to the said Rameshwar Singh Yadav.

( 2 ) THE writ peition is contested by the Nagarpalika Parishad by filing a counter affidavit.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top