SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 697

M.KATJU
AJAI PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ ADHIKARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dan Bahadur Yadav

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed against the impugned termination order dated March. 5, 1992 (Annexure 6 to the writ petition ). I have heard Sri D. B. Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed on October. 10, 1977 as Panchayat Raj Adhikari and was confirmed on April. 19, 1989. There was some complaint against him and the B. D. O. Shikohabad made a preliminary inquiry and submitted a preliminary report on January 1, 1991 against the petitioner. The petitioner was then charge-sheeted and the same B. D. O. who had submitted the preliminary report was appointed the Inquiry Officer and he submitted the charge-sheet dated October 1, 1991 vide Annexure-1 to this writ petition. In this inquiry the petitioner was found guilty, consequently his service was terminated.

( 3 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the rules of Natural Justice have been violated since the person holding the preliminary inquiry has also held the regular inquiry. This petition was admitted on April 20. 1992 but no counter affidavit has been filed and hence I am presuming the allegations in the petition to be correct.





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top