SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 1061

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
G. S. N. TRIPATHI
MITHOO SINGH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 3181 Of 1979
Decided On : 10/16/1995

Advocates Appeared:
Pt.Mohan Chandra

The reliability of a test identification parade and the sufficiency of evidence to prove the involvement of an accused in a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 395, INDIAN PENAL CODE - IDENTIFICATION PARADE - TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES - SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE - IDENTIFICATION OF ACCUSED - RELIABILITY OF TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE - FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED - LAPSE OF TIME BETWEEN INCIDENT AND IDENTIFICATION PARADE - AVAILABILITY OF LIGHT - KEEPING ACCUSED BAPARDA - MOVEMENTS OF ACCUSED DURING INCIDENT - ABILITY OF WITNESSES TO SEE FACES OF ACCUSED - SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE TO PROVE INVOLVEMENT OF ACCUSED BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.

Fact of the Case:

The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with other dacoits, committed dacoity in the house of the complainant. The accused were identified by witnesses in a test identification parade held more than 54 days after the incident. The accused challenged the reliability of the identification parade and the sufficiency of evidence to prove their involvement in the dacoity.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the test identification parade was held after a long lapse of time, which could have affected the memory of the witnesses. The court also noted that the light available to the witnesses during the incident was scanty and that the accused were kept Baparda, which diminished the value of the test identification parade. The court further observed that the witnesses could not have seen the faces of the accused clearly due to the movements of the dacoits and the firing during the incident.

Issues: 1. Whether the test identification parade was reliable and sufficient to identify the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Whether the evidence on record was sufficient to prove the involvement of the accused in the dacoity.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the test identification parade was not reliable due to the long lapse of time between the incident and the parade, the scanty light available to the witnesses, and the fact that the accused were kept Baparda. The court also found that the evidence on record was insufficient to prove the involvement of the accused in the dacoity beyond a reasonable doubt.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused, and ordered their release.

G. S. N. TRIPATHI, J.


( 1 ) THE then Vth Addl. Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad, vide his judgement and orderdated 27-11-79 passed in S. T. No. 3268 of 1974 State v. Mithoo Singh and Jalal Uddin, held the accused Mithoo Singh and Jalal Uddin guilty on a charge under Section 395, I. P. C. and sentenced them to undergo 5 years R. I.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case started on the basis of the F. I. R. lodged by Vishwa Nath Singh, P. W. 1 at the police station Talgram on 16-6-72 at 7. 15 A. M, The distance of the police station is about 4 miles from the place of occurrence. The incident is said to have taken place on 15/16-6-72 around midnight.

( 3 ) THE complainant has alleged that he was sleeping in his house. A lantern was burning in the Angan of his house. Around midnight, about 14-15 dacoits entered his house and they caught hold of the complainant and his wife. They were compelled to sit inside the courtyard. Their movements were being watched by 3-4 dacoits. The remaining dacoits also came inside the courtyard and they started threatening the complainant and his wife. They were flashing their torches as well. They were constantly on move, going inside and outside. Four of them had guns. Others had lathis, dandas, spears etc. After hearing the alarm, P. W. 2 Harbans Singh, P. W. 4 Shiv Pal and others arrived there. The phoos kept at a distance, was burnt. That gave abundant light. The witnesses had also torches and they were flashing them. The dacoits were of different size. After completing dacoity, they retreated. Thereafter the F. I. R. contains a list of the properties looted.

( 4 ) DURING the course of investigation, the I. O. reached the spot, prepared the site-plan, inspected the torches and lantern and prepared the memos for them. On different dates the accused were arrested. They were put up for test identification parade. They were identified by witnesses Harbans Singh P. W. 2, and Shiv Pal, P. W. 4. Vishwanath Singh, P. W. 1 also identified the dacoits. After concluding the investigation the I. O. submitted the charge sheet against the accused.

( 5 ) THE prosecution examined P. W. 1 Vishwanath Singh. He has narrated the prosecution story as contained in the F. I. R. He also identified the accused in the Court.

( 6 ) HARBANS Singh P. W. 2 and Shiv Pal, P. W. 4 had given evidence in the same vein.

( 7 ) P. W. 3 Genda Lal had burnt the phoos.

( 8 ) P. W. 5 Sri Roshan Lal Verma is the Investigating Officer.

( 9 ) OTHER documents on the record were admitted by the learned counsel for the accused. Therefore formal evidence was not led.

( 10 ) THE accused in their statements under Section 313, Cr. P. C. have said that they were known to the witnesses from before and they were not involved in the dacoity. They have led no evidence in their defence.

( 11 ) AFTER perusal of the entire evidence and circumstances on the record, the learned lower Court concluded that the prosecution had proved its case beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt against the accused. He accordingly sentenced them as noted above.

( 12 ) FEELING aggrieved, the accused appellants have preferred this appeal.

( 13 ) I have heard learned counsel for the parties at stretch and gone through the record. I find that this appeal has got much force and it deserves to be allowed.

( 14 ) THE factum that the dacoity was committed in the house of Vishwa Nath Singh on 15/16-6-72 is not disputed. The dacoits were armed with firearms and various other weapons, which they used during the course of dacoity. As many as three persons received firearm injuries on their persons on the firing resorted to by the dacoits. Learned counsel for the accused has not challenged the factum of dacoity and the finding on the point arrived at by the learned lower Court.

( 15 ) THE main question for consideration is as to whether the prosecution has proved involvement of these accused in this case. For that, the learned lower Court has given a chart at page 4 of his judgement. The performance of Vishw










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top