SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 1180

G.P.MATHUR, KUNDAN SINGH
PARSU RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K.SHARMA, TAJ RAM

KUNDAN SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 17-11-89, passed by Sri U. C. Saxena, the then Special Judge (D. A. A.)/iiird Additional Sessions Judge, Etah in Session Trial No. 144 of 1987, whereby appellant Parshu Ram has been convicted under Ss. 302, 395, 307/149 and 148, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, 7 years R. I. , 4 years R. I. andone years R. I. respectively, while Babu Ram has been convicted under Ss. 302/149, 395, 307/149 and 147 I. P. C. and sentenced to life imprisonment, 7 years R. I. , 4 years R. I. and six months R. I. , respectively. The other appellants have been convicted under Sections 302/149, 395, 307/149 and 148, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life, 7 years R. I. , 4 years R. I. and one years R. I. , respectively and all the sentences of each of the accused appellant were directed to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case as set out in the F. I. R. lodged by Kishan Lal at 5. 10 a. m. on 24-7-87 at police station Malavan, District Etah, is that all the accused persons and Kishan Lal informant are residents of village Saithari, P. S. Malavan, District Etah. Accused Parshu Ram and Am


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top