SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 1181

BRIJESH KUMAR, A.S.GILL
AMRITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
S. K. SRIVASTAVA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anand Mohan, Pradeep Kant, R.K.SRIVASTAVA, R.N.SRIVASTAVA, S.K.Agrawal, Sidharth Verma, Sudhir Shanker

BRIJESH KUMAR, J.


( 1 ) THIS first appeal from order has been preferred against the order dated 30. 3. 1982 passed by the motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (V Additional District Judge), Lucknow, dismissing the claim petition preferred by the appellant holding that it was legally not maintainable.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the claim petition are that one Mohan Singh Yadav, the deceased husband of appellant No. 1, was travelling by a motor cycle as pillion rider and was going from the Mall to Malihabad on 11. 3. 1979. At about 5. 30 p. m. , he met with an accident at Malihabad railway Crossing receiving injury by the railway collapsible gate as a result of which he died. The motor cycle bearing registration No. JKB 6426 was being driven by S. K. Srivastava. S. K. Srivastava disputed the claim on the ground that he was not responsible for the accident and also for the reason that as a pillion rider, the deceased had not taken the required protection by putting on protective head-gear. His case was that due to sudden fall of the crossbar at the time he was negotiating the railway line, the accident occurred and the injuries were sustained by the deceased as well as by S. K. Srivast















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top