SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 91

S.K.PHAUJDAR
RAM AUTAR GOEL – Appellant
Versus
JAGANNATH GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.M.Dayal, K.N.TRIPATHI, L.M.Singh, N.D.Ray, R.P.Goyal

S. K. PHAUJDAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23. 4. 86 recorded by the Judge of the Court of small Causes, Kanpur Nagar, in S. C. C. Suit No. 25 of 1985. The matter was once heard by me and was disposed of by my order dated 7. 7. 97 whereby the revisional application was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE aggrieved revisionist went up in Civil Appeal No. 7329 of 1997 arising out of an S. L. P. (C) No. 18906 of 1997 to the Honble Supreme Court. The leave as prayed for was granted. The matter was heard and it was remanded back to this Court with an observation that the real dispute which survived in the revision was whether decree for possession as passed by the trial court on the ground of denial of title of the landlord by the present revisionist was legally justified or not and the Honlile Supreme Court was further of the view that this question, unfortunately, was not examined by the High Court on merits.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff-respondents sued for possession of the suit premises on two grounds, (I) default in payment of rent and (2) denial of the title of the plaintiffs by the ten












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top