S.K.PHAUJDAR, N.S.GUPTA
VIRENDRA SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 2 ) THE detention order was recorded on 2-7-97 and the petitioner stood detained from 3-7-97. The impugned order simply stated that the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, was satisfied that the detention of Virendra Shukla for preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to maintenance of public order was necessary and accordingly the order under Section 3 (2) of the National Security Act was passed. This order stood confirmed under Section 12 (1) of the National Security Act on 27-8-97 authorising his detention for 12 months from 3-7-97.
( 3 ) THE grounds of detention that were served upon the petitioner as required under Section 8 of the Act stated that on 12-6-97 the petitioner had shot at his tenant Sudheer Singh and his wife and others killing Sudheer Singh and injuring Smt. Bhawna Singh and Shiv Mangal Singh. This action was allegedly taken with a view to see that the tenanted premises be vacated and Case Crime No. 331 of 19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.