SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 300

M.KATJU, S.L.SARAF
S. RATHI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRIPA SHANKAR NANDA, S.G.HASNAIN, U.N.Sharma

( 1 ) IN this case on three occasions the learned Standing Counsel was granted time to file counter affidavit but no counter affidavit has been filed so far. In the circumstances we treat the allegations in the writ petition to be correct. This is a public interest litigation. The petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing the respondents to provide separate schools with vocational training, hostels with regular medical checkup facilities etc. in every district of Uttar Pradesh for the children of lepers. In paragraph 4 of the petition the petitioner referred to three leprosy homes in Allahabad which are not getting any assistance from the Government except the medicines which too is at the free will of hospital authorities. In paragraphs 5 it is stated that on certain occasions the lepers are getting clothing and food from N. G. Os.

( 2 ) IN our opinion, the relief claimed for is just and is in accordance with Article 21 of the Constitution which has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that every citizen is entitled to a life of dignity. Hence the petition is allowed and the mandamus as prayed for is granted. Petition allowed.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top