SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 353

O.P.GARG
SUDHIR CHANDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
S. K. RAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI, K.K.Arora

O. P. GARG, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision application under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Court Act which has been preferred against the order dated 19th December. 1997 passed by the IInd additional District Judge, Moradabad rejecting the defence of the defendant-revisionist under order XV, Rule 5, Civil Procedure Code.

( 2 ) HEARD Sri A. K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the defendant-revisionist and Sri K. K. Arora, learned counsel for the plaintiff-opposite parties.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff-opposite panties have instituted a S. C. C. Suit No. 1 of 1993 against the defendant-revisionist for his eviction from the disputed accommodation and for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profit. Admittedly, the relationship of landlord and tenant exists between the parties and the defendant-revisionist was the tenant of the house at the monthly rent of Rs. 1. 400. The suit was contested by the defendant-revisionist and it is alleged that after the service of the Illegal notice, the defendant-revisionist besides sending the reply to the notice also remitted a sum of Rs. 4,200 as being rent due through cheque. In the written statement filed by the defendant-revisionist, he has. Inter ali










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top