( 1 ) IT is alleged that the petitioners as plaintiff instituted a suit being Original Suit No. 460 of 1992 in the Court of Additional Chief City Magistrate, Vth Court, Kanpur Dehat, against opposite parties Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 as defendants, for specific performance of contract for sale executed by the opposite party No. 3 (defendant No. 1) in favour of the petitioners Nos. 1 and 2. It is alleged that the defendant No. 1 had executed sale-deed in respect of the selfsame property in favour of the opposite parties Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6 respectively.

( 2 ) SRI K. K. Nirkhi, learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that a compromise was arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No. 3 and accordingly application for compromise was filed before the trial Court. The learned trial Court by an order dated 16-3-1994 had rejected the said application for compromise. Against the said order the petitioners have preferred revision being Civil Revision No. 74 of 1994. By an order dated 27-2-1998 passed by Vth Additional District Judge, Kanpur Nagar, the said revision was dismissed. Learned Counsel for the petitioners contends that he has challenged only this order dated 27-2-