SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 552

A.K.BANERJI
BANKEY BIHARI – Appellant
Versus
SURYA NARAIN ALIAS MUNNOO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN GUPTA, R.N.SINGHA, S.N.Singh

ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal by the plaintiff-appellant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 14-11-1980 passed by the VII Additional District Judge, Gorakhpur by which the said Court had allowed the appeal filed by the defendant and set aside the decree passed in favour of the plaintiff by the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts, in brief, are that the plaintiff filed Original Suit No. 104 of 1976 against the defendant for cancellation of a gift deed dated 11-4-1969 executed by Purshottam Dass in favour of the defendant to the extent of 1/3rd share in the house in dispute. The plaintiff and the defendant are the real brothers and sons of the said Purshottam Dass. The plaintiff also sought possession over a portion of the house described in the plaint, if not found in possession, and also prayed for a decree of declaration to the effect that the plaintiff was the owner in possession of the portion of the house specified in the sketch map annexed to the plaint. The plaintiffs case was that the property in question was an ancestral property which on partition came to the share of their father Purshottam Dass who remained in possession of the same as
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top