SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 599

D.K.SETH
GANGA RAM – Appellant
Versus
SECOND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MUZAFFAR NAGAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Usha Kiran

D. K. SETH, J.


( 1 ) ORIGINAL Suit No. 625 of 1975 was instituted before the Munsif, Muzaffarnagar for specific performance of a contract by the plaintiff-decree holder against the defendant-petitioner. The suit was decreed on 30th September. 1980. After the decree became final, an execution was levied. Execution Case No. 32 of 1984 was registered thereupon. In the said execution process, a draft deed was prepared and submitted to the Court for approval. The judgment debtor objected to one of the clauses being incorporated in the draft deed. The objection was overruled by an order dated 24th March, 1998 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J. D.), Muzaffarnagar in said execution Case No. 32 of 1984. Thereupon, the petitioner preferred an appeal being Misc. Appeal No. 58 of 1998. It was partly allowed by an order dated 21. 4. 1998 passed by the learned additional District Judge, IInd Court, Muzaffarnagar. It is this order which has since been challenged in the present writ petition.

( 2 ) KM. Usha Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner had argued that in the decree it was directed that the deed should be executed within a period of one month. The judgment debtor did not execute the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top