SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 680

O.P.JAIN
MAHESH CHANDRA MISRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.L.GAUR, DILIP KUMAR, RAJIV GUPTA

O. P. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against order dated 2/02/1998 passed by Sessions Judge, Mainpuri by which process has been issued against the revisionists on the application filed by the prosecution under Section 319, Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are somewhat unusual. According to F. I. R. (Annexure-1) lodged by complainant Ashok Kumar Dixit, opposite partyno. 2, he had to go to ease himself at 1. 00 a. m. in the night intervening 10th/ 11/04/1992. He found that as usual truck No. U. P.-77/9264 belonging to his brother, Indresh Kumar Dixit, was parked nearby. His brother Indresh Kumar Dixit and the driver of the truck, Alok Kumar Dixit, were sleeping on the roof of the cabin of the truck. Suddenly driver Alok Kumar Dixit started the truck and switched on the head lights of the truck. As soon as he did so, six persons namely Mahesh Chandra, Ganesh Chandra, Ajay Kumar, Kamlesh Kumar, Yogesh Kumar and Jayant Kumar (revisionists) together with three unknown persons boarded the truck and the driver, Alok Kumar Dixit, took the truck towards Bewar. Complainants brother Indresh was raising an alarm from the roof of the cabin of the truck. It is the further case of co



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top