SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 673

J.C.GUPTA
RAJ BAHADUR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE, FATEHPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Sand

J. C. GUPTA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is tenants writ petition for quashing the Judgments and orders dated 21. 8. 87, annexure-3, dated 16,2. 89, Annexure-4, and dated 11. 10. 90. Annexure-5.

( 2 ) THE respondent No. 3 filed suit for ejectment and arrears of rent against the petitioner in the court of respondent No. 2. The same was dismissed on the ground of non-service of notice of demand and termination and also on the ground that the defend ant-petitioner was entitled to get the benefit of the provision of Section 20 (4) of the U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972, (hereinafter referred as the Act ). Aggrieved by the said judgment, respondent No. 3 preferred revision before the District Judge and the same was allowed by the Judgment dated 21. 8. 87 wherein it was held that the defendant-petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of Section 20 (4) of the Act as the amount deposited by him fell short by Rs. 15. 40. However, the case was remanded to the trial court to decide according to law the question of service and validity of notice and default. After the remand, the trial court by the Judgment dated 16. 2,89 decreed the suit. The revision preferred by the petitioner has also been dismissed by the l


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top