SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 743

S.K.PHAUJDAR
VEER PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
TILKA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MALIKARJUN DAS, Rishi Ram, VIRENDRA SINGH

S. K. PHAUJDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has invoked powers under S. 482, Cr. P. C. for expunction of certain remarks in the judgment of the trial Court in Case No. 756 of 1983 recorded by Sri D. D. Upadhya, the then J. M. Ist Class, Nagina, district Bijnor.

( 2 ) THE case was instituted upon an FIR lodged by the present applicant for offences under Ss. 409, 468, 471, 420, 109 and 435, I. P. C. against several persons. The applicant had also deposed as a witness before the Court below. A reading of the judgment indicates (in paragraph 7) that the Court was of the view that there was no evidence against the accused persons about setting fire to the stock of wheat. In coming to this conclusion, rather at a subsequent paragraph of the judgment, the trial Court had recorded certain observations regarding the conduct of the witnesses including the present applicant. These remarks are to be found in paragraph 8 of the judgment. A perusal of the records indicate that while the Magistrate had every right to criticise the conduct of the witnesses, he had perhaps exceeded the freedom of judicial officers while making oblique comments against the witnesses. The comments may be quoted below :"ye






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top