SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 815

R.K.MAHAJAN, PALOK BASU
KAMLESH PARIHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Girdhar Nath, Jagdish Singh Sengar


PALOK BASIL AND R. K. MAHAJAN, JJ.

( 1 ) THE applicants, Kamlesh Parihar and Dr. J. S. Parashari, have filed this criminal revision against the order dated 31. 3. 1998 passed by the Sessions Judge. Pillbhit whereby he has allowed the application filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and cancelled thefr bail, thus setting aside the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit dated 28. 1. 1997 granting bail to the applicants in case Crime No. 381 of 1996. P. S. Kotwali, District Pilibhit under Sections 420. 467. 468. 471, 409 and 120b, I. P. C. registered against them alleging embezzlement of Rs. l,03. 18,420. 85p. It has been further directed that both the applicants should be taken into custody and if both or either of the applicants is not present in Court, his sureties will produce him or them before the chief Judicial Magistrate on 6. 4. 1998. By an interim order dated 7. 4. 1998 passed by a learned single Judge when this revision was filed, the aforesaid direction of the Sessions Judge dated 31. 3. 1998 was meanwhile stayed which operates till date. During the pendency of this revision, counter-affidavits for the State of U. P. as well as for the C. B. I. have been filed to




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top