SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 846

GIRIDHAR MALAVIYA, K.D.SHAHI
MADHURIMA BHARGAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.AVASTHI, RAVI KIRAN JAIN

K. D. SHAHI, J.


( 1 ) THE question referred by the single Judge, Honble S. K. Phaujdar, J. is :-"whether in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr. P. C. , the Court could direct compounding the offences which are not made compoundable under Section 320 Cr. P. C. specially in case under Section 498-A of the I. P. C. "

( 2 ) IT shall be proper to give some facts of the case before adverting to reply the question. Smt. Meena Bhargava was wedded to Aditya Bhargava on 6th of October, 1990, according to Hindu rite and rituals. On 26-6-1992, she lodged a report at police station Haldwani, district Nainital under Section 498-A, I. P. C. and S. 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act against her husband Aditya Bhargava, Nanads (husbands sister) Ku. Madhurima Bhargava and Kum. Kavita Bhargava, Jeth (elder brother of husband) Pradeep Bhargava, Jethani (elder brothers wife of husband) Smt. Krishna Bhargava, mother-in-law Smt. Subhashini and father-in-lawdr. P. D. Bhargava and on that basis police filed criminal case No. 799 of 1994 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital. These accused persons filed a petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. which was registered as Criminal Misc. Application No.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top