SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 841

S.K.PHAUJDAR
NEELAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DINESH DWIVEDI, S.D.KAUTILYA

S. K. PHAUJDAR, J.


( 1 ) THE present application under S. 482, Cr. P. C. was filed on 22-7-1998 for quashing the proceedings initiated at the instance of the opposite party under S. 145, Cr. P. C. now pending in the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Nainital, as also for quashing an order under S. 146 (1), Cr. P. C. directing attachment of the property in question and dispossession to thepresent applicants from the premises. There was a further prayer that the proceedings in question in case No. 11/24 of 1998 be stayed during the pendency of the present proceedings.

( 2 ) WHEN the matter came up as a fresh one on 23-7-1998 appearance was made for the opposite parties by Sri R. K. Sinha. The learned counsel for the applicants S/sri Dinesh Dwivedi and S. D. Kautilya and Sri R. K. Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties, were heard and the matter was directed to be listed on 18-8-1998. There had been an interim order, the order of attachment under S. 146, Cr. P. C. was stayed.

( 3 ) SUBSEQUENTLY, on 4-8-1998 another petition was moved with a prayer for calling for the records of Criminal Revision No. 93 of 1998 and the aforesaid Criminal Case No. 11/24 of 1998 and to quash th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top