SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1088

D.K.SETH
HARENDRA KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.D.Singh, R.N.Singh, S.K.VERMA, S.N.Singh, Sidhartha Verma, V.K.SINGH

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) WRIT Petition No. 10842 of 1992 was filed by one Shri Harendra Kumar Singh who contained that a requisition dated 3. 3. 1991, signed by the Manager, being Annexure-1 to the writ petition, was notified to the Commission that one Shri Ram Murthy Pandey, holding the post of Lecturer in Sanskrit would be retiring on 30. 6. 1991, resulting into a substantive vacancy which was required to be filled up. On account of anticipated vacancy an advertisement was issued on 14. 3. 1991, which is contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition, inviting candidates for appointment in the said vacancy, for which applications were to be submitted within 23. 7. 1991. It was also pointed out in the said advertisement that the interview alongwith the original certificates would be held on 14. 7. 1991 at 11. 00 a. m. Thus the advertisement itself contradicts in the matter that the last date for submission of applications was fixed on 23. 7. 1991 and the interview was fixed on 14. 7. 1991 viz. , before 9 days of the last date for submitting the applications for the appointment. This raises a suspicion about the genuineness of the said advertisement. The interview cannot precede the last



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top