D.K.TRIVEDI
JAGTAR SINGH CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
TIRLOK CHAND – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and decree dated 16th May, 1981 passed by the then IVth Addl. District Judge. Lucknow in S. C. C. Suit No. 8 of 1980, in exercise of the powers of Judge. Small Causes Court.
( 2 ) IT appears that the revisionist was a tenant of the ground floor portion of a house situate at 2 sarvpalli, Mall Avenue, Lucknow. The landlord-opposite party filed a suit for ejectment on the ground of default In making payment of rent and he also prayed for the amount of outstanding rent, water tax, drainage tax and damages for use and occupation. The revisionist claimed that he was not under an obligation to pay the water and drainage taxes and that he had offered the rent in the month of November, 1979 which was refused by the landlord, that the revisionist claimed that he had deposited a sum of Rs. 2. 240 as house tax which he was entitled to adjust, and that he was also entitled to the benefit of Section 20 sub-section (4) and he had made compliance thereof by depositing the rent and costs. He also claimed that no notice was served on him.
( 3 ) BOTH the parties adduced evidence oral and documentary. The learned trial court cam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.