SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1061

D.K.SETH
RAJESH KUMAR DWIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Tandon, V.K.RAI

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner alleges that he was appointed in the post of clerk in the institution pursuant to a resolution dated 31. 8. 1997 passed by the Committee of Management. An appointment letter was issued to him on 1st September, 1997, which stipulates that the order of appointment would be enforceable only with the approval of the District Inspector of Schools as is apparent from annexure-5. The petitioner joined the school on 2nd September. 1997. On 7th September, 1997, the papers were forwarded by the Committee of Management to the District Inspector of schools. By an order dated 22nd September, 1997, the District Inspector of Schools had refused to grant approval to the appointment on the ground that no approval could be granted under the rules. This order was challenged by means of Writ Petition No. 33547 of 1997 since been disposed of by an order dated 13lh October. 1997. By the said order, the District Inspector of schools was directed, to reconsider the question of approval and specify the defects In the appointment and communicate the reason to the petitioner within the stipulated time. Despite communication of the said order, the District Inspector of Scho















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top